Welcome to SDIN Forums Login | Register | Faq  

    SDIN Forums
  Sustainable Development Issues Network
Search  
   
Input from Hemantha Withanage
Started by Shiney at 02-10-2005 12:36 PM. Topic has 3 replies.

Print Search « Previous Thread Next Thread »
  02-10-2005, 12:36 PM
Shiney Varghese is not online. Last active: 2/10/2005 5:00:24 PM Shiney

Top 25 Posts
Joined on 02-10-2005
Posts 1
Initial call for comments on Caucus Lobby Points

Attachment: FWCaucus,LobbyPoints,2005-01-26.doc

Hi,

The thirteenth session of the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD-13) will be the first “policy session” under the Commission’s new work cycle, and the focus will be on water, sanitation and human settlements.  CSD 13 will be comprised of two events: the Intercessional Intergovernmental Preparatory Meeting (28 February – 4 March, 2005) and the Main Session (11-22 April, 2005).

As governments will be gathering to set important policy directions for the future use (or misuse) of water at these upcoming meetings, it is important to ensure that civil society voices are heard and are taken into account by governments not only to help people suffering from water-borne diseases, lack of water supply and sanitation, etc. but also to prevent future degradation of freshwater ecosystems.


Thus, it is critical that this year the governments and policy-makers take into account the broad range of water issues, not simply drinking water, sanitation and human settlements. 

We have formulated a DRAFT ‘Priorities for Action’ (see below) on the basis of points raised by members of the UNCSD freshwater caucus, as well as on-going discussions in different parts of the world. (Report from the Pan African Civil Society gathering to
elaborate common positions to CSD 13 with focus on water and sanitation issues, discussions re: World Social Forum Water events planning process and Peoples Water Forum planning process, Major group papers submitted to the CSD secretariat etc.)

This is the first draft circulated among the Freshwater caucus members, as well as to other issue caucuses of SDIN and major groups such as women, youth indigenous groups at UNCSD. The response has been very good and we are in the process of incorporating the comments. We invite comments from all those interested in any aspect of sustainable water use and management to provide input to us to help us fine tune this. Please forward this weblink to all relevant networks to enable us to reach a wider community.  

Please cc your comments on this forum  to Karin Krchnak (kmk@carlthewebmaster.com) and Shiney varghese (svarghese@iatp.org), and we look forward to seeing your inputs by 20th of February 2005. Thank you,

Shiney Varghese and Karin Krchnak, 
Co-coordinators, Freshwater Caucus.


(See attachment link above for document draft)


   Report 
  02-14-2005, 6:20 PM
Karin K is not online. Last active: 2/14/2005 5:09:36 PM Karin K

Top 10 Posts
Joined on 02-14-2005
Posts 3
Comments from Michelle Leighton
Dear Shiney and Karin,
 
It was also nice to talk with you this week regarding upcoming CSD sessions. Regarding this statement below on water issues, I know last year we submitted the human right to water paper which speicified government obligations under the Economic Social and Cultural Rights Covenant, ratified by 142 governments.  I wonder if the human right to water, alluded to in several paragraphs in the statement, could be enhanced, and or language directly from the Committee on Econ,Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment 15 on gov't obligations, could be used?  You might take a look again at what the Committee indicates is required of governments to provide in fulfilling the right to water, but it certainly touches on a majority of themes below, cast in human rights language.
 
Let me know if you'd like to discuss this further.
best to you both,
 
Michelle
 

   Report 
  02-15-2005, 10:26 AM
Karin K is not online. Last active: 2/14/2005 5:09:36 PM Karin K

Top 10 Posts
Joined on 02-14-2005
Posts 3
Additional comments from Michelle Leighton

Some additional suggested changes from Michelle Leighton:


[...]

2. All policy actions agreed upon at CSD 13 should consider the cross-cutting issues established at CSD 11 (Poverty eradication, Changing unsustainable patterns of consumption and production, Protecting and managing the natural resource base of economic and social development, Gender equality, and Education etc.) as well as governance, which although not included at CSD 11, is critical for effective and sound water and sanitation management.

 

II. Providing Safe Drinking Water to All

 

1.  Governments should seek every means available to protect, respect and fulfill their human rights obligations relating to the right to water, including to ensure that water development, management and allocation decisions address the traditional difficulties women, children, minority groups, indigenous people, and other vulnerable groups in society have in exercising their right.

According to the secretary General’s report[1] ‘Governments that are lagging significantly behind in meeting the water goals and targets may wish to review their national (sustainable) development strategies with a view to increasing the priority assigned to providing access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation. Some countries (e.g. South Africa 2) have chosen to enshrine a right of access to water in their constitutions, while others reflect this in national water legislation.’ [II. Providing Safe Drinking Water to All, Point 5. p. 3]

 

[...]

 

5.

We wish to underline SG’s suggestion that “Where private participation is sought, wide public consultation is crucial to building consensus on the rationale for and the form of that participation.’ [II. Providing Safe Drinking Water to All, Point 7. p. 4]. However, it should be recognized that consultation alone is not sufficient; public participation should take place in advance of any consideration of private sector participation. Moreover, privatization of water services does not relieve governments of their human rights obligations to respect, protect and fulfill the right to water.  Governments must regulate and oversee the private sector’s management of water to assure the respect, protection, and fulfillment of their human rights obligations toward civil society.

 


III. Implementing Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM)

 

[...]


9.

The role of education of future generations should be a component of policy interventions as policy and technical solutions will require a citizenry educated on the hydrological cycle and the need for sustainable management of water resources as a basic component of each person, government, private business, association, etc.

The role of education as a means of fulfilling government obligations under the right to water includes for present generations concerning hygienic use of water and sanitation.

 

[...]

 

20.

The full realization to the right to water transcends national boundaries, and developed nations have a duty to assist developing nations .  The donor governments need to step up their effort towards the achievement of the 0.7% target of GDP for ODA; in allocating their ODA resources national governments should prioritize water management with crosscutting themes of Poverty eradication, Changing unsustainable patterns of consumption and production, Protecting and managing the natural resource base of economic and social development, Gender equality, Education etc.

 

According to OECD analysis of bilateral and multilateral aid to the water sector, the water supply and sanitation sector receives about 6% of bilateral aid, and some 4-5% of multilateral aid, despite water and sanitation being their priority area for funding (75% of the OECD contributions to the water sector during the last five years went to water and sanitation sector).

 

Sustainable management of water resources is fundamental to our future, and it needs increased public funding commitments not only to water and sanitation but also to Integrated Water Resources Management. This should be the top priority to all governments.

 



[1] Freshwater management: Policy options and possible actions to expedite implementation, Commission on Sustainable Development Thirteenth session

11-22 April 2004, Item 4 (a) of the provision al agenda*, Thematic cluster for the implementation cycle 2004/2005– Policy Session: Water

 

 

 


   Report 
  02-15-2005, 1:18 PM
Karin K is not online. Last active: 2/14/2005 5:09:36 PM Karin K

Top 10 Posts
Joined on 02-14-2005
Posts 3
Input from Hemantha Withanage

Dear Karin and shiney,

Please find my comments( in blue) below  for DRAFT Fresh water caucus priorities for action.I wills send you a monitoring report on the water sector in Sri Lanka.

***********************
Hemantha Withanage,
Executive Director, Centre for Environmental Justice,
Convenor, Sri Lankan Working Group on Trade and IFIs,
59/14, Kuruppu Road, Colombo 8, Sri Lanka.
email: hemanthaw@eureka.lk, info@ejustice.lk, slwg@ejustice.lk
Tel/Fax: 0094-112-683 282
***********************

DRAFT, 26th January 2005.

DRAFT Fresh water caucus priorities for action: (Seeking inputs)

[...]

II. Providing Safe Drinking Water to All

[...]

5.

We wish to underline SG's suggestion that "Where private participation is sought, wide public consultation is crucial to building consensus on the
rationale for and the form of that participation.' [II. Providing Safe Drinking Water to All, Point 7. p. 4]. However, it should be recognized that consultation alone is not sufficient; public participation should take place in advance of any consideration of private sector participation.
I propose in such situations a Referendum should be done.

III. Implementing Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM)

6.

In developing IWRM plans, governments should ensure the following:

[...]

o      Plans specifically address the issues raised by civil society in the
CSD process (e.g. sustainable production & consumption, sustainable food
systems, education, sustainable energy & climate change, environment & human
rights, earth values, peace, gender, indigenous issues etc among others) I believe that water is the most important natural resources for the sustainable livelihood of the people. In Sri Lanka we have development projects such as Colombo –Matara expressway which detroy home gardens, paddy fields which is the sole income generation for majority of the affected people. Majority of them do not have government of other paid jobs. We should make sure that these development project do not destroy water, watersheds etc.

[...]

10.

[...]

o    Pre-cautionary principles to be applied in adopting biotechnology
research; and independent funding be made available for peer-reviewed
research to determine whether bio-tech crops have in fact yielded positive
results in terms of enhanced crop yields per litre of water consumed.

Biotech plants is a controversial subject. I believe we should not support biotech industry even by reviewing whether it gives positive results.

o      Industrial agricultural sector, as opposed to small farmers, may be
asked to pay the actual cost for the resources, including water and cheap
subsidized feed crops, they use in farm production. I also believe that profit making businesses should pay the actual cost of water. But this should not ensure them water availability at the cost of poor in the same community/area. ( We have suchs situations that Prima flour company located in Trincomalee have access to 24 hours water service while people in the area have one hour in the morning and one hour in the evening)

[...]

15.

The World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), regional banks like
the Asian Development Bank, African Development Bank and the Inter-American
Development Bank must stop the imposition of water privatisation or 'full
cost recovery' as a condition for new loans and renewal of loans of
developing countries. Agree they also should stop the implementing agencies ( such as National Water Supply and Drainage Board in Sri Lanka) violating the riparian rights of the farmers etc.

We have some water projects funded through the 3rd ADB water and sanitary project which transfer the water form farmers to consumer groups. These water transfers( for eg “Thuruwila wewa” water project, “Kadupity Oya” water project) violate ancient water rights of the communities. This shouls not happen.

Similar water transfers happening in many other small projects which CBOs and NGOs are also involved.

[...]

20.

The donor governments need to step up their effort towards the achievement
of the 0.7% target of GDP for ODA; in allocating their ODA resources
national governments should prioritize water management with crosscutting
themes of Poverty eradication, Changing unsustainable patterns of
consumption and production, Protecting and managing the natural resource
base of economic and social development, Gender equality, Education etc. agree, 2005  Budget for Sri Lanka allocated only .2% on top of other taxes for these


   Report 
Post
SDIN Forums » All Stakeholder... » Fresh Water Pol... » Input from Hemantha Withanage

Powered by Community Server, by Telligent Systems